Can we allow some wiggle room for data0 file selection based on the T/P curve intersection?
I have a data0 file set to 1 bar pressure (attached), and a T range:
temperatures
0.0100 25.0000 60.0000 100.0000
150.0000 250.0000 300.0000 350.0000
pressures
1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0132
4.7572 39.7365 85.8378 165.2113
and when i try to run oit on a campaign that asks for T=38C and P=1bar, i get.
$ Exception:
$ The temperature and pressure ranges provided in the campaign file do
$ not overlap with any of the pressure vs. temperature curves specified
$ in the provided data0 files.
looking at datga0_cst.d1f, it seems that the pressure fitting equations (lines 137-140). are not exactly on 1 bar:
$ *-----------------------------------------------------------------------
$ presg
$ 9.999993399E-01 6.604400440E-05-3.740814081E-06 4.400440044E-08
$ 3.143450000E+00-7.823846667E-02 7.786810000E-04-3.808053333E-06 1.714840000E-08
I think this is causing the mismatch. Probably because I left P constant for the first 3 T points, before increasing it. So there is some bend in the fitting function as It cannot kink, but is smoothed across the transition from 1 bar to >1 bar between the 60 and 100C grid points.
data0_cst.txt
Can we allow some wiggle room for data0 file selection based on the T/P curve intersection?
I have a data0 file set to 1 bar pressure (attached), and a T range:
temperatures
0.0100 25.0000 60.0000 100.0000
150.0000 250.0000 300.0000 350.0000
pressures
1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0132
4.7572 39.7365 85.8378 165.2113
and when i try to run oit on a campaign that asks for T=38C and P=1bar, i get.
$ Exception:
$ The temperature and pressure ranges provided in the campaign file do
$ not overlap with any of the pressure vs. temperature curves specified
$ in the provided data0 files.
looking at datga0_cst.d1f, it seems that the pressure fitting equations (lines 137-140). are not exactly on 1 bar:
$ *-----------------------------------------------------------------------
$ presg
$ 9.999993399E-01 6.604400440E-05-3.740814081E-06 4.400440044E-08
$ 3.143450000E+00-7.823846667E-02 7.786810000E-04-3.808053333E-06 1.714840000E-08
I think this is causing the mismatch. Probably because I left P constant for the first 3 T points, before increasing it. So there is some bend in the fitting function as It cannot kink, but is smoothed across the transition from 1 bar to >1 bar between the 60 and 100C grid points.
data0_cst.txt