initialize_tree_random_dense (develop) or initialize_apr_tree (master) appears to give incorrect results. It is not currently used anywhere in the library, but it can (should) be much faster than the "sparse" version. However, as we're moving away from the RandomAccess data structures I'm not sure there is much use in fixing it.
initialize_tree_random_dense(develop) orinitialize_apr_tree(master) appears to give incorrect results. It is not currently used anywhere in the library, but it can (should) be much faster than the "sparse" version. However, as we're moving away from theRandomAccessdata structures I'm not sure there is much use in fixing it.