From e383a3560a7dbf17cf05a038566576e0059cf69b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Donalson Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 15:30:11 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Update front-page evaluation to the October 20 Claude Sonnet 5.5 A/B --- src/routes/+page.svelte | 21 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/routes/+page.svelte b/src/routes/+page.svelte index 3df6ceaa..439d4740 100644 --- a/src/routes/+page.svelte +++ b/src/routes/+page.svelte @@ -344,23 +344,26 @@

- Measured with real agent tasks · internal evaluation · October 5, 2026 + Measured with real agent tasks · internal evaluation · October 20, 2026

- Higher accuracy. Fewer calls. Fewer tokens. + Fewer calls. Fewer turns. Lower cost.

-
23% higherfile-and-symbol accuracy
-
14% fewertokens per task, on average
-
14% fewertool calls per task, on average
+
26% fewertool calls per task, on average
+
25% feweragent turns per task, on average
+
20% lowermodel cost per task, on average
About the evaluation

- Claude Sonnet with and without Context Engine: 80 paired comparisons across 40 code-navigation - tasks in two repositories. Accuracy measures correct-file and correct-symbol recall, improving - from 52.2% to 64.3%. Average tokens decreased from 1.01M to 0.88M and tool calls from 25.5 to - 21.8. + Claude Sonnet 5.5 with and without Context Engine: 80 paired runs (40 code-navigation tasks, + two seeds) in two repositories. Tool calls per task fell from 14.2 to 10.4 and agent turns + from 15.2 to 11.4 (both p < 0.001); model cost per task fell from $0.118 to $0.094 + (p = 0.02). Answer accuracy held level (60.5% vs 61.3%). Intervals are task-clustered + bootstrap; p-values are task-level sign-flip permutation tests. An earlier October 5, 2026 + evaluation with Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured file-and-symbol accuracy rising from 52.2% to + 64.3%.

With learning enabled, retrieval adapts as feedback accumulates. These measurements capture