Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
52 lines (39 loc) · 4.59 KB

MONETIZATION.md

File metadata and controls

52 lines (39 loc) · 4.59 KB

ScreenNote Monetization — Free Beta → Sustainable Model Assessment

Status: Free beta (0.5.0). No accounts, no subscriptions, no payments enabled. This document assesses path to sustainability without inventing demand.

1. Current model [EVIDENCE]

  • Free beta — LAUNCH-READINESS.md:45: "No card, account, subscription or paid upgrade is enabled."
  • No paid tier exists — COMPETITIVE_BENCHMARK.md:21: "ScreenNote: ✅ Everything (beta) — No paid tier exists."
  • Ceiling = 1 GB shared budget + 10 min / 50 MB per clip — PRODUCT_IDENTITY.md:62; live health check maxSeconds:600,maxBytes:50000000
  • Creator control = capability keys + recovery-key JSON — PRODUCT_IDENTITY.md:56; no workspace seats, no accounts
  • No analytics, no AI transcription, no enterprise features — PRODUCT_IDENTITY.md:58; COMPETITIVE_BENCHMARK.md:58–77

2. What can not be charged for [EVIDENCE]

Feature Reason
Screen recording (desktop browser) Core capability; no value-add to charge
Import from device MP4/WebM Documented fallback; no fair-charge path
Timestamped threads + reply-to-any-reply Core differentiator vs Loom/Tella/Bubbles
1/3/7-day expiry + password protection Explicitly part of the free beta promise
Recovery-key JSON restores management Not video file restoration (§ PRODUCT_IDENTITY.md:56)
Local IndexedDB library Client-side only; no server cost per user
No-account viewing/commenting Core access model; P4 (no accounts, no polling)

3. Sustainable-model hypotheses [HYPOTHESIS — validate, don't publish]

  • H-A: The winnable wedge is private, expiring, no-account feedback for individuals/freelancers who find Loom/Tella workspaces heavy and Frame.io too production-oriented. Test via landing-page message + 5 user interviews. Do not build a paid tier until interviews confirm willingness to pay for expiry-control + privacy.
  • H-B: Monetization, when needed, should price storage/egress + expiry control, not seats — ScreenNote's 1 GB shared budget maps cleanly to a "shared-clip credits" model (cf. Tella credits). Do not charge per seat — that imports the workspace complexity ScreenNote avoids.
  • H-C: Android native + import fallback is sufficient for beta; iOS native capture (ReplayKit) is the only mobile investment that changes competitive parity. Defer paid-model investment until physical-device acceptance passes.
  • H-D: Frame.io/Vimeo Review are complements for pro review, not substitutes for capture. Competing there would dilute the async-explainer wedge; keep scope narrow.

4. What should not be done [ABSOLUTE — no invented demand]

  • ❌ Do not create a "Pro" or "Business" tier with seat pricing — that contradicts P4 (no accounts, no seats)
  • ❌ Do not charge for "unlimited clips" — the 1 GB / 10 min / 50 MB caps are the ceiling; exceeding them requires platform quota assessment, not a product tier
  • ❌ Do not charge for AI transcription/editing — it is explicitly not included (PRODUCT_IDENTITY.md:58); adding it would require a fundamental product pivot
  • ❌ Do not imply "free forever" as a commercial claim — label it "constrained free beta" per LAUNCH-READINESS.md:11,43–44
  • ❌ Do not invent demand (e.g. "users will pay for collaboration features" without interview data). The competitive data shows many $0 free tiers exist (Loom Starter, Bubbles Free, Frame.io Free); price alone is not a moat.

5. Path to sustainability (if/when required)

Step Evidence Action
1 5–10 user interviews per LAUNCH-READINESS.md:55–59 Validate H-A willingness to pay for expiry + privacy
2 Real cohort transfer data per LAUNCH-READINESS.md:49–53 Measure egress/cost per active user before any pricing
3 If H-A & H-B positive: design a "shared-clip credits" model pricing storage/egress + expiry control Keep per-clip, not per-seat; align with 1 GB / 10 min / 50 MB ceiling
4 Update LAUNCH-READINESS.md and MONETIZATION.md Document the new model; retain "free beta" label until paid tier is live
5 If negative: continue as constrained free beta indefinitely No paid tier shipped = no commercial claim

Bottom line: ScreenNote 0.5.0 is a constrained free beta. No paid tier, no accounts, no subscriptions. Any future monetization must be grounded in validated user willingness to pay for expiry/privacy control — not invented demand or seat-based pricing that conflicts with the no-account design.

Document generated 2026-11-08 as part of ScreenNote flagship-excellence final phase. No hypotheses are published as fact.