[BurhanAbdullah]

Summary

Introduces ConnectorBench, a dependency-light, read-only conformance inspector for MCP tool catalogs.

• Validates tool names and detects duplicate registrations.
• Checks input schema shape, required-property declarations, and JSON serializability.
• Reports missing descriptions as warnings rather than failures.
• Integrates the checks into the existing connector entrypoint smoke test.
• Adds deterministic tests for valid catalogs and representative contract violations.

Safety and scope

• The inspector never invokes connector tools or launches a solver.
• No README files are changed.
• This is separate from PSCAD lifecycle work and simulation-result comparison.

Validation

CI is required before this is considered ready to merge. Skipped or unsupported checks must not be treated as passing.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-14T05:09:00.074316Z	7a937cd	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7a937cdac0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".