pair programming rebrand - #2004
Open
Liam310 wants to merge 8 commits into
Open
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for cyf-curriculum ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for cyf-common ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
illicitonion
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2026
|
|
||
| A **volunteer** that wants to be a coding mentor should: | ||
|
|
||
| - Create a bookable calendar for 30 minute appointments, something like [Google Calendar](https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/10729749?hl=en) or [Calendly](https://calendly.com/integration#calendars) works well |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| - Create a bookable calendar for 30 minute appointments, something like [Google Calendar](https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/10729749?hl=en) or [Calendly](https://calendly.com/integration#calendars) works well | |
| - Create a bookable calendar for 60 minute appointments, something like [Google Calendar](https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/10729749?hl=en) or [Calendly](https://calendly.com/integration#calendars) works well |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's a point, IMO 30 minutes is too short but I personally allocate 45-minute slots on my booking schedule to give me time for: slight run-over, writing up my notes, and a 5-minute break (just checked and all the other edu leads are either 45 or 50 mins). How about saying "45-60 minute appointments"?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(@illicitonion Just tagging you as I don't know whether you'll ever get notified about this comment or not)
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
45-60 minutes works for me!
github-project-automation
Bot
moved this from 📋 Backlog
to 👀 In review
in Curriculum Planning
Co-authored-by: Daniel Wagner-Hall <dawagner@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've gone through the curriculum repo and tried to replace all the relevant mentions of "pair programming" with "mentored coding". It's worth noting that there remain a lot of mentions of "pair programming" in the repo, but from what I can see they are all genuine references to the industry practice (e.g. talking about recommending it for launch projects).
Additionally, I've pulled the pair programming guide into two separate guides, one for mentored coding and one for industry pair programming. I pulled out what was already there and wrote a bunch of extra stuff in there that's new as well, so I would be grateful for a once-over of that just to check it all makes sense and isn't riddled with typos. Thanks in advance 🙂