Active Members host at least one Technical Seminar#286
Conversation
… the academic year
|
Rewording proposal: Diff:
|
|
I personally don't like this amendment, because it will inevitably lead to people hosting low effort seminars just to fill the requirement, and i would much rather have people host seminars because they actually want to rather than just to fill a requirement |
shaeespring
left a comment
shaeespring
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry... Pedantry. But also I don't know if you meant this change to be semesterly or yearly
shaeespring
left a comment
shaeespring
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i lied. You meant yearly and have it as yearly.
|
Was informed that you are making more changes. Just so that I can remember that it's not ready for review, I am changing this to a draft PR Mark it as ready for review when it's ready, that way I know it can go on the slides. As a reminder, there are only two House Meetings left, one of them being Elections on Saturday (not sure if that's official but it's probable) |
|
I think that my commit completely broke somewhere along the merges... yikes |
Co-authored-by: Shaela Spring <shaeespring@gmail.com>
| \item Host at least one Technical seminar or pass a Technical major project | ||
| \end{enumerate} | ||
|
|
||
| Active Members must participate in at least one major project during the academic year. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this be a part of the list?
There's a lot of text related to this one but it feels weird to say "here's all the stuff you should do" anyway "also you have to do this"
|
You should update the PR title to be more accurate to the updated contents |
5 participants
This adds a requirement to being an Active Member, which is that every Active Member must host at least one Technical Seminar during the academic year, and will be evaluated as part of a Membership Eval.
Common concerns and solutions:
C: "Some people are really averse to presenting."
S: Presentations are part of the curriculum for most if not all majors at RIT, as well as your professional career. This is GREAT practice for those times, since attendance will likely be 10-20 people, which is less than your average RIT class. It is also much less pressure than that of a job. It's not unfair to ask members of house to do this if they are expected to do it in class and/or in the field, and it's great practice for those who are averse to presenting.
(I'll add more as I see more concerns)
Check one:
Summary of change(s):