๐จ ํ๋ ํธ: [UX ๊ฐ์ ] ๋ค๋น๊ฒ์ด์ ๋๋๋งํฌ์ ๋ฒ์ญ ๋๊ตฌ ํธํ์ฑ ํฅ์ - #714
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
๐ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a ๐ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Warning Review limit reachedNext included review available in 38 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: Youโve used the included review currently available. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Review configuration: โ๏ธ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: ๐ Files selected for processing (3)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
seonghobae
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Exact-head review on 8cbdf3b9f9574f22b8937fc1555c6ba3de34e9fb:
-
.jules/palette.mdadds this work under2024-09-16, but this PR was created on 2026-09-16 and the adjacent ledger entry is already 2026-08-17. Unless this is deliberately replaying a documented 2024 artifact with source evidence, this backdates provenance by two years. RED: a traceability check that the new palette entry identifies the actual work date/source. GREEN: correct the entry to the current work date (or cite the historical source if it truly is historical) without rewriting prior ledger history. -
The source change is accessibility/UI behavior, while the test only string-matches generated HTML. That does not verify the PR's stated reason: browser translation must update the text node and the
navaccessible name must be computed fromaria-labelledby. Please add current-head browser acceptance that loads the generated page, verifies the navigation landmark accessible name derives exactly once from#nav-label, confirms the visually-hidden heading remains non-visible but present to AT, exercises keyboard navigation/focus, andโif the Chrome Translate compatibility claim remains in the PR/ledgerโcaptures a real translated-DOM/accessibility-tree result rather than assuming text-node translation. Preserve the existingaria-labelregression assertion so the old untranslated attribute does not return. UI Delivery Gate remains pending until that evidence is terminal on this exact head.
Do not use a source-neutral wake commit for queued checks; the current CI/CodeQL/Security/SAST generation is still queued and should settle on the unchanged causal head.
๐ก ๋ด์ฉ:
<nav>์์์aria-label์ ์๊ฐ์ ์ผ๋ก ์จ๊ฒจ์ง<h2>์์์aria-labelledby๋ก ๊ต์ฒดํ์ต๋๋ค.๐ฏ ์ด์ : ๋ธ๋ผ์ฐ์ ๋ฒ์ญ ๋๊ตฌ๊ฐ
aria-label์์ฑ์ ๋ฒ์ญํ์ง ๋ชปํ๋ ๋ฌธ์ ๋ฅผ ํด๊ฒฐํ์ฌ, ๋ค๊ตญ์ด ํ๊ฒฝ์์ ์คํฌ๋ฆฐ ๋ฆฌ๋ ์ฌ์ฉ์๊ฐ ์ฌ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ์ธ์ด๋ก ์๋ด๋ฐ์ ์ ์๋๋ก ํฉ๋๋ค.๐ธ ๋ณ๊ฒฝ ์ /ํ: (์๊ฐ์ ๋ณ๊ฒฝ ์์, ์คํฌ๋ฆฐ ๋ฆฌ๋ ๊ฒฝํ ๊ฐ์ )
โฟ ์ ๊ทผ์ฑ: ๋ธ๋ผ์ฐ์ ๋ฒ์ญ ์ ์คํฌ๋ฆฐ ๋ฆฌ๋ ํธํ์ฑ ํฅ์
PR created automatically by Jules for task 8672272015988098153 started by @seonghobae