Repository navigation
Conversation
This was referenced Nov 12, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
For
C=[[1+i,1-i],[1-i,1+i]]/2, prove the exact scale needed to make every axis prefix integral when both the input and complete tensor output are Gaussian integral. Claim type: scoped written proof with exact finite corroboration.The proof uses both integral endpoints. Paired-coordinate inputs attain the bound at every cut, including a middle cut of any fixed axis order. This supplies a sharp arithmetic bridge to #7429's intermediate-integrality precondition. No new kappa or selected-frontier change is claimed.
Produced by Nick Petalas. Credit CubeJerry #7429 at
1a555e469b89af70d309bc966f8f813ac11dc887for the literal positive C leaf and its explicit integrality gap; jmbarrancoml #3091 and alejandrozu for the established C tensor, physical axis method and unrestricted reserve; and Clear1nsight #3382 for the different maximal simultaneous exactness lattice. Classical fractional-ideal and tensor methods retain their prior credit. No predecessor scientific verifier is imported or replayed.Only six new files under
research/native-c-endpoint-prefix-scale/are added. Advance CLAIM.Evidence
From the repository root:
Another installed CPython 3.12 path can replace the shown interpreter. Expected markers are
PASS_NATIVE_C_ENDPOINT_PREFIX_SCALE,PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGEandPASS_RESEARCH_COMMIT_BYTES.Limitations and unrun obligations
The integral final output is a required promise. Signed-range bounds, literal scale/unscale programs, source admission, ownership, movement, scratch and retained-history costs remain open. This proof supplies no complete physical MOVE/caller, paid/productive invoice, selected assumption discharge or complete multiplication theorem. All five framework assumptions remain. Native-machine and selected cold replays, formal-kernel verification and independent human review were not run. Every registered local command passed; no registered local obligation is deferred to CI.
Canonical main was refreshed before submission and remains
e54523517d0f03e58352e647c403a5af3e525a57, priority revision 8, selected #7000. Exact-formula, general partial-product, main-tree, merged-PR and live-claim searches found no same-scope result in the inspected coverage. The final overlap refresh reported 767 open PRs and 7,348 Discussion records with complete pagination and no warnings. Unpublished work and arbitrary unsearched diffs remain outside that coverage.Open next questions
Install the sharp scale around one literal positive C leaf: supply an actual producer with integral final output, prove sufficient intermediate signed width, and price both exact conversions with movement, owners, scratch and retained history. A favorable complete bill is required before any supplier claim. This contribution stops at the first sharp arithmetic result and reserves no follow-up.
Related open work
The completion refresh inspected the six other open PRs from this account created since the CLAIM, #7462 through #7467. The only same-MOVE contribution is #7462, already listed above. The other scopes concern different matrices, helper-subspace optimization or compiler width; no competing integral-prefix scale or numerical disagreement was identified. No extra mathematical computations were run to compare them.
CI notes
At unchanged head
8b0dd714d30e9c1574387587eb6418ae99ac34e1, run 43281155683, the plan job failed in Onboarding helper tests. The log reports 760 tests, one failure and 24 skipped. The exact failed test istest_research_current_status.CurrentCiNavigationTests.test_current_ci_section_matches_selected_record, withAssertionError: '`make frontier7000-verify`' not foundindocs/ci-verification.md.The mismatch is present in canonical base
e54523517d0f03e58352e647c403a5af3e525a57:certificates/selected-result.jsonnamesmake frontier7000-verify, while the current section ofdocs/ci-verification.mdstill describes #6030 andmake frontier6030-verify. Both base files were inspected directly. This PR changes only its six new package files.The same exact test, assertion and
FAILED (failures=1, skipped=24)summary were independently verified in run 42905094314, plan job 130140894651, run 42903313790, plan job 130134720799, and run 43279933171, plan job 131398194664. Each log reports 760 tests. This comparison concerns only the shared CI failure, not those contributions' mathematical results.The package replay job was skipped because planning failed. CI did not certify this package. The local normal/optimized scientific checks, registered metadata/source-pin replay, committed-byte/source-history preflight and read-only Git-free optimized replay passed as recorded above. Hosted package certification remains unavailable pending the repository-level repair. No fix, retrigger commit or job rerun was made. The contribution's head and mathematical scope are unchanged.
Merge Danger
Door: two-way
Blast Radius: isolated
Six new package files. Shared code, frozen predecessors and the selected frontier are unchanged.