Skip to content

Decide on Repository name #3

Closed
Closed

Description

@BenjaminRodenberg

It is always possible to move repositories. I think we should rename EBFM_with_YAC to something else since YAC is optional and not the main feature of the code (see #2).

I think it is important to do this renaming early before people get used to temporary names and we build tooling based on the repository URL.

Activity

  1. BenjaminRodenberg commented on Nov 6, 2025

    @BenjaminRodenberg
    CollaboratorAuthor

    @wardvp Would simply calling the repo EBFM be ok? If you have another name in mind that's also 100% ok. We can carry out the technical steps for naming together in a call if you want. (I cannot do this because I do not have admin rights)

  2. wardvp commented on Nov 6, 2025

    @wardvp
    Collaborator

    @BenjaminRodenberg I have renamed it to EBFM. It was rather easy (via settings), but maybe I forgot something?

  3. BenjaminRodenberg commented on Nov 6, 2025

    @BenjaminRodenberg
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Perfect :) Thanks for taking care of this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions