Currently, I can feed anything into client_identifier and it doesn't error. ever.
What doesn't help is the fact the example code has some inconsistense that is hard to tell if they're just typos, or intended.
# You can also use the following as `client_identifier`:
# Chrome --> chrome_103, chrome_104, chrome_105, chrome_106, chrome_107, chrome_108, chrome109, Chrome110,
# chrome111, chrome112, chrome_116_PSK, chrome_116_PSK_PQ, chrome_117, chrome_120
# Firefox --> firefox_102, firefox_104, firefox108, Firefox110, firefox_117, firefox_120
# Opera --> opera_89, opera_90
# Safari --> safari_15_3, safari_15_6_1, safari_16_0
# iOS --> safari_ios_15_5, safari_ios_15_6, safari_ios_16_0
# iPadOS --> safari_ios_15_6
# Android --> okhttp4_android_7, okhttp4_android_8, okhttp4_android_9, okhttp4_android_10, okhttp4_android_11,
# okhttp4_android_12, okhttp4_android_13
#
"firefox108", "Firefox110" and "chrome109", "Chrome110" and more stands out, is this a typo, or what? hard to tell when the library doesn't error on invalid options.
Also, what are in those DLL files? any way I can inspect them ? Are they even open source?
Currently, I can feed anything into client_identifier and it doesn't error. ever.
What doesn't help is the fact the example code has some inconsistense that is hard to tell if they're just typos, or intended.
"firefox108", "Firefox110" and "chrome109", "Chrome110" and more stands out, is this a typo, or what? hard to tell when the library doesn't error on invalid options.
Also, what are in those DLL files? any way I can inspect them ? Are they even open source?