You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
order1: $\Large g_t=\frac{\langle\beta_s\rangle\gamma_\infty}{1-\langle\beta_s\rangle\kappa_\infty}$,
from Hoekstra et al 1998 (Eq. 5)
order2: $\Large g_t=\frac{\langle\beta_s\rangle\gamma_\infty}{1-\langle\beta_s\rangle\kappa\infty}\left[1+\left(\frac{\langle\beta_s^2\rangle}{\langle\beta_s\rangle^2}-1\right)\langle\beta_s\rangle\kappa_\infty\right]$,
from Hoekstra et al 1998 (Eq. 7) and Schrabback1 et al 2017 (Eq. 12)
I suggest renaming this order1 with order0, and making a new order1:
That is the equation that was implemented in v1.0 but I think it accidentally got overwritte.
Note
In the future, we can also implement a new approach: $\Large g_t=\frac{1-\frac{\langle\beta_s^3\rangle}{\langle\beta_s^2\rangle}\kappa_\infty+\frac{\langle\beta_s^2\rangle}{\langle\beta_s\rangle}\kappa_\infty}{1-\frac{\langle\beta_s^3\rangle}{\langle\beta_s^2\rangle}\kappa_\infty}\langle\beta_s\rangle\gamma_\infty$,
from Seitz & Schneider et al 1997 (Eq. A2.5)
It was dropped because 'order2' took the result directly from 'order1'. And yes, the calculation is actually Applegate et al 2014 Eq. 1, so we still need to add the Eq. 6 in the paper.
Activity
hsinfan1996 commentedon Apr 10, 2026
It was dropped because 'order2' took the result directly from 'order1'. And yes, the calculation is actually Applegate et al 2014 Eq. 1, so we still need to add the Eq. 6 in the paper.