Archive smoke round-4 Logbook row (tail 27→28) - #651
Merged
Conversation
Appends the round-4 attempt: populace-us-2024-stacked-f001-s578-…-6eda41f8 (disposition failed, phases through gap_filled, wall 1854s, code_pin 7c720fe, authority v6), chained on round 3's tail. Round 4 cleared both gap-fill directions and the PUF predictor preflight for the first time and stopped in the clone-2 capital-gains tail on 1%-scale donor support for filing status SEPARATE — tracked separately. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Data-only append, validated 28-row chain, tail
6eda41f8…. Round 4 (first build on the merged #649 fixes) reachedgap_filled— deepest phase yet — and stopped at the capital-gains tail's SEPARATE-status donor support at 1% scale; that failure is tracked as its own issue. Spool mirror updated; backfill guards are append-proof since #650's follow-up.🤖 Generated with Claude Code