[RecursiveIntell]

Summary

• Add a dated freshness marker to the root library README and SciFact evaluation guide after checking their version, schema, fixture-shape, default-model, and source-layout statements against current files.
• No product source, configuration, or test files changed.

Validation

• GitHub-renderer README audit: both files pass with zero errors or warnings.
• Claim-ledger verifier: the source-grounded checks pass for both files.
• README command extraction: 2 root commands and 8 evaluation-guide commands extracted in dry-run mode; none executed.
• Local Markdown links/assets resolve; secret-pattern scan found no matches; git diff --check passes.
• Rust/evaluation commands were not run; this README-only change does not alter runtime behavior.

Automation note: created by the hourly README review task.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	🔄 Running since 2026-10-23T15:32:56.873487Z	2a88ed2	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.