Repository navigation
Show how each model scores, and where it does well - #1506
Open
mohamedelabbas1996 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
mohamedelabbas1996 wants to merge 1 commit into
mohamedelabbas1996 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
The scores existed in the API and nowhere on screen. This puts them in the three places someone asks the question from: An algorithm's own page lists its evaluations, so a model can be judged on its record rather than on the one number someone remembers. A species page shows how each scored model did on that species, which is how a taxonomist asks whether a model can be trusted for the thing they work on. A taxa list names the best model for it, ranked on the per-species average rather than the plain share, because trap data is long-tailed and a model that is right about the common species looks good either way. The evaluation count a model was not asked about is shown with the score: an accuracy over six of sixty species reads the same as one over all of them. Carved out of the branch behind #1423, leaving its copy of the training job form behind: that form was rebuilt in the retraining stack, and the training-data tab it added needs an endpoint that lives there.
✅ Deploy Preview for antenna-preview ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
Contributor
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Next included review available in 9 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. Review configuration: ⚙️ Run configuration
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
mohamedelabbas1996
added this pull request to stack #1498
October 9, 2026 05:32
✅ Deploy Preview for antenna-ssec ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The scores from #1493 exist in the API and nowhere on screen. This puts them in the three places someone actually asks the question from.
Each score is shown with how much it covers. An accuracy over six of a model's sixty species reads the same as one over all of them.
Replaces #1423
That branch sat on my fork, targeted
main, and carried a copy of the training job form from before the retraining work was split up. The form has since been rebuilt in #1504, and the training-data tab it added needs an endpoint that lives in #1502, so neither came across. What is here is the evaluation UI only, on top of the branch whose API it reads.Stack