[SYMBaiEX]

User problem

Cycle 5 implementation #27 merged in PR #32, but the research gate #29 and milestone still described it as active work. The roadmap needs to close that cycle accurately and make the next research/build loop reviewable.

Evidence and scope

• PR docs: record Cycle 5 research decision #31 records the Cycle 5 source sweep and decision; PR fix(core): clarify controller hub logical ID lifecycle #32 implements and merges the selected ControllerHub contract and lifecycle tests.
• This roadmap update records implementation results, review/check status, research coverage limits, and the current Project V2 permissions blocker.
• It opens Cycle 6 gate Cycle 6 research gate: select and ship one bounded reliability improvement #35 in the DAG. Cycle 6 research gate: select and ship one bounded reliability improvement #35 is blocked by Cycle 5 research gate: select the next evidence-backed improvement #29 and selected issue Preserve cleanup and failure context in native test #20; candidates Align native adapter capabilities with configured bridge outputs #33 and Reject negative controller action durations #34 remain deferred.
• Cycle 6 selection is a bounded native CLI failure-cleanup issue, grounded in a direct code-path gap. Outside Computer Use reports are contextual evidence, not OpenController incidents.

Acceptance

• Roadmap, milestone, and issue Cycle 5 research gate: select the next evidence-backed improvement #29 status agree with merged PRs docs: record Cycle 5 research decision #31/fix(core): clarify controller hub logical ID lifecycle #32.
• The Cycle 6 source log includes direct observations, fit limits, access gaps, and a ranked repository audit.
• Issue Cycle 6 research gate: select and ship one bounded reliability improvement #35 and its dependency edges are in place before Cycle 5 research gate: select the next evidence-backed improvement #29 closes.
• No Project V2 is claimed; repository issues and milestones remain the tracker until Projects write access is granted.

Validation

• git diff --check passed.
• Manually checked issue links, commit hashes, selection, milestone status, DAG, and source limitations against GitHub and current main.
• Documentation-only change; no runtime tests were run.

Closes #29

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 37 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: defaults
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: d795fc4e-db02-451e-85a9-cf24404f0b60

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e6d5769 and d23a973.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/roadmap/ai-gaming-opportunities.md

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}