Repository navigation
Quote only fees #82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
oniisanlabs
wants to merge
10
commits into
Twigpine:main
Choose a base branch
from
oniisanlabs:codex/quote-only-fees
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Quote only fees #82
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
26dae36
feat(contracts): optional quote-only creator fees (QuoteLaunchFactory…
oniisanlabs 5ae78be
feat(indexer): index the quote-only suite beside the original one
oniisanlabs f51cd0b
feat(launchpad): launch, trade and collect with the quote-only suite
oniisanlabs 0fc90c8
docs: doc comments on every function the quote-only suite touches
oniisanlabs fad41cb
Merge upstream main and integrate quote fees with profiles and points
codex e56a923
fix(vault): reject underfunded payout calls
codex 8e71721
Merge upstream main and preserve quote fee collection
codex 0938144
fix(app): keep backfill progress and quote fee impact accurate
codex 096d689
Merge upstream Earn and Boost into quote-only fees
codex 0cb08d9
Merge upstream community pairs into quote-only fees
codex File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
pr-guardblocks this workflow change.The
pr-guardjob fails because this PR edits.github/workflows/ci.yml. The guard rejects changes to CI configuration from ordinary PRs. As a result, the CI run cannot pass as submitted.The Postgres password (Lines 31 and 57) is a credential for a throwaway CI service. It is not a secret leak.
Choose one of these options:
forge testlines into a separate maintainer-owned PR. Then land this PR without the workflow edit.Also applies to: 55-58, 87-88
🧰 Tools
🪛 Betterleaks (1.8.1)
[high] 31-31: Detected a potential hardcoded password literal, which may expose account credentials.
(generic-password)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Sources: Linters/SAST tools, Pipeline failures