Skip to content

docs: retire status entries that #492 was holding - #494

Merged
BunsDev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs-archive-followup
Nov 4, 2026
Merged

BunsDev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs-archive-followup

Conversation

@BunsDev

@BunsDev BunsDev commented Nov 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Finishes #493. These lines stayed as they were so #492 could merge cleanly; it has now landed, so the two stale "In flight" entries move to status history and the #319, #322 and #323 rows match main. No issue boxes changed.

Docs only: the relative-link check shows the same 4 known misses. No local build or test run, since no code changed; CI runs them.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The last In flight entries for landed work, and the checklist rows #492 edited,
now match main. No issue box changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Nov 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
modex Ready Ready Preview Nov 4, 2026 5:59am UTC

Request Review

@github-code-quality

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code coverage overview

Languages: TypeScript

TypeScript / code-coverage-agent

main a4f2f70 docs-archive-followu... 1b23181 +/-
66% 66% 0%

ℹ️ Calculations represent line coverage. Results may change as calculations are updated.

@BunsDev
BunsDev added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 4, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 49ff1e1 Nov 4, 2026
11 checks passed
@BunsDev
BunsDev deleted the docs-archive-followup branch November 4, 2026 08:27

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview — 1b231810 Deployed Nov 4, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant