fix(library): remove unrelated Dungeon Defense backup chapters

[anantham]

Summary

The Dungeon Defense backup contains 33 chapters from another novel and inconsistent chapter numbers. Remove those records and their 66 URL mappings, leaving 476 verified Dungeon Defense chapters while preserving every retained translation, illustration, feedback item and the saved reading position.

The accompanying acceptance correction reflects the operator's community-publishing clarification: an index must cover the available selected revision, while the novel and translations may remain works in progress. Incremental refresh remains explicitly unfinished.

Changes

• Update the LFS-backed session after reproducing all 476 stable IDs and independently matching numbered titles; reuse the existing publisher helper for 29 number corrections.
• Preserve 416 saved translation versions, 7 feedback items, 104 comparison records and all retained chapter payloads; keep the original artifact backed up.
• Record exact old/new hashes and structural/import evidence in docs/reviews/DUNGEON-DEFENSE-SESSION-CLEANUP-2026-09-07.md.
• Reconcile Issues, FEAT-006 and its acceptance checklist; record the operator's exact publication approval.

Validation

• Exact original LFS hash/size; final strict JSON parse and hash/size.
• Chapters are uniquely numbered 1–476; all retained mappings/comparisons belong to retained chapters.
• Structural comparison preserves all retained payloads apart from the proven number corrections.
• Selected-text corpus identity is unchanged from the verified local evaluation.
• Node 24.19 production build and actual full-file import into a fresh Chromium profile: 476 chapters, saved chapter 256 restored, no page errors.
• Real local love/betrayal scan results survive actual export and offline native-file import with exact scores in fresh desktop and Pixel-emulated Chromium profiles; changed text/book invalidates, identical text and feedback-only edits preserve.
• Fresh CI: all five jobs pass; 317 test files, 9,562 tests passed, 347 skipped.
• Codex review of final head 0d606c621a633e6324e429b3c472121ab6562953: no major issues.

No application code or runtime configuration changes. CI/source checks do not certify deployed owner transport, incremental refresh, semantic quality or physical-device behavior. The cleaned LFS object and this publication were explicitly approved by the operator.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
lexicon-forge	Ready	Preview	Sep 7, 2026 3:33pm UTC

[anantham]

@codex review

Please review head 0d606c621a633e6324e429b3c472121ab6562953. Scope is the tracked documentation delta, LFS pointer and public structural-verification receipt. Do not fetch or inspect the novel LFS payload. No application code changed. Challenge preservation claims, work-in-progress acceptance semantics and any overstatement of local versus deployed/device evidence.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray!

Reviewed commit: 0d606c621a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".