Skip to content

Add performance indexes - #13856

Draft
sb-abhish3k wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:4.22from
shapeblue:add-performance-indexes
Draft

sb-abhish3k wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:4.22from
shapeblue:add-performance-indexes

Conversation

@sb-abhish3k

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

Adds performance indexes for common DB lookups.

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 19.74%. Comparing base (5e5ae0c) to head (bdf94b2).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #13856      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     19.72%   19.74%   +0.01%     
- Complexity    19941    19962      +21     
============================================
  Files          6371     6371              
  Lines        575738   575784      +46     
  Branches      70471    70478       +7     
============================================
+ Hits         113582   113672      +90     
+ Misses       449810   449758      -52     
- Partials      12346    12354       +8     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.41% <ø> (ø)
unittests 21.02% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment thread engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-42210to42300.sql Outdated
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

@sb-abhish3k

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sb-abhish3k a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 18968

@DaanHoogland

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blueorangutan test

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland moved this from Backlog to Ready in CloudStack Testing Aug 31, 2026
@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-16850)

@shwstppr

shwstppr commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 19038

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm, but I think we are about to release 23, so the calls will need to be moved soon/before merging

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland assigned shwstppr and unassigned shwstppr Sep 1, 2026
@sb-abhish3k

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Rebased to target 4.22 branch

@blueorangutan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 19334

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: Ready

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants