You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Recent developments in AI for Mathematics (AI4Math) — especially LLM-driven theorem provers — have achieved remarkable milestones in formal proof generation within Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP) environments such as Lean 4, Coq, and Isabelle. However, current systems remain fundamentally limited when tackling frontier research mathematics: discovering new theorems, resolving open conjectures, and engaging with problems that are open-ended, under-specified, and deeply abstract.
We argue that the next leap requires a decisive shift from predefined problem-solvers to research agents capable of addressing frontier mathematical challenges with rigorous formal reasoning. This repository organizes the literature covered in our position paper across:
Autoformalization — translating natural language mathematics into ITP-verifiable formal statements
Training Strategies — SFT, RL, expert iteration, and reflective learning for proof generation
Test-time Adaptation — planning, decomposition, and retrieval augmentation at inference time
Agentic Proving — multi-agent, tool-augmented proving systems
Datasets & Benchmarks — evaluation infrastructure for neural theorem proving
🗂️ Taxonomy
We organize recent approaches along three complementary axes: