feat: ground source follow-up answers - #9
Merged
Conversation
fly1d
commented
Aug 11, 2026
fly1d
left a comment
Owner
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code review completed with no blocking findings. Verified: source excerpts are bounded at generation and consumption; source-aware follow-ups run before generic rules; unsupported questions return an explicit evidence-limit response; built-in MCP follow-ups remain unchanged; encyclopedia-only quick questions preserve button count and layout; desktop/mobile browser checks and all 16 automated tests pass.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Closes #8
Risk
Verification
npm run cipasses locallyVerification notes:
All 16 local checks pass. A real service test used a live
量子纠缠result as/api/askcontext and verified that unsupported application/price questions did not invent facts. Browser testing at 1280px and 390x844 verified the three encyclopedia quick questions, the再讲详细interaction, no text or horizontal overflow, and no console warnings/errors.Review and release
Rollback plan:
Revert this PR. Wikipedia summaries remain available, while follow-up questions return to the existing generic rules; no migration or dependency rollback is required.