fix: rewrite extension skill command references#3474
Open
NgoQuocViet2001 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Closes github#3451 Assisted-by: Codex (model: GPT-5, autonomous)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Closes #3451
Testing
uv run specify --helpuv sync && uv run pytestAdditional validation:
uv run pytest tests/test_extension_skills.py tests/test_extensions.py tests/integrations/test_base.py tests/integrations/test_integration_kimi.py tests/integrations/test_integration_zcode.py -q(527 passed, 14 skipped)uvx ruff check src/specify_cli/extensions/__init__.py tests/test_extension_skills.pygit diff --checkThe sample-project coverage installs an extension into temporary Codex, Kimi, and Claude projects and verifies both rewritten invocations and preserved path/link references.
AI Disclosure
Codex (GPT-5, autonomous) analyzed the issue, implemented and iteratively tested the change on behalf of @NgoQuocViet2001. The operator requested this contribution but did not manually author or line-by-line review the patch.