Skip to content

Blind-score the V3 targeted confirmation - #3529

Open
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
Gxgsta5jm3iasu652ow7bfbefe3c2r6nbfrom
G3rihw6xuj2lcqvojuxabx73mkjzsgdd5
Open

Blind-score the V3 targeted confirmation#3529
joshlf wants to merge 1 commit into
Gxgsta5jm3iasu652ow7bfbefe3c2r6nbfrom
G3rihw6xuj2lcqvojuxabx73mkjzsgdd5

Conversation

@joshlf

@joshlf joshlf commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Complete independent blind scoring, adjudication, condition unblinding, and
the preregistered result for all 80 reports. Preserve score packets, ledgers,
adjudications, integrity checks, event history, and the machine-readable result
needed to reproduce the decision.

V3 earns 272 of 300 required atoms, and every atom reaches 5/5 in S, Q, W, M,
R, and K: symbolic release coverage, quantifier-sensitive existential
certificates, whole-execution behavior, positive multi-version proofs,
abstraction-redesign firewalling, and regression breadth. K nevertheless has
one authority-inventory defect, so it does not pass the complete zero-defect
gate. In C, C1 reaches 1/5 and C3 through C5 reach 3/5; in X, X4, X6, and X7
reach 0/5 and X11 reaches 2/5. Two C reports contain hard TCB or authority
defects.

The aggregate identifies a narrower failure class but does not diagnose it:
agents often reach a plausible conclusion without a complete, reversible
derivation of the quantified case set or construction relation. Because the
all-atoms, hard-error, and authority gates fail, V3 is not accepted despite its
high pooled atom count and strong performance in other modes.


Latest Update: v5 — Compare vs v4

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v5 vs v4 vs v3 vs v2 vs v1 vs Base
v4 vs v3 vs v2 vs v1 vs Base
v3 vs v2 vs v1 vs Base
v2 vs v1 vs Base
v1 vs Base
⬇️ Download this PR

Branch

git fetch origin refs/heads/G3rihw6xuj2lcqvojuxabx73mkjzsgdd5 && git checkout -b pr-G3rihw6xuj2lcqvojuxabx73mkjzsgdd5 FETCH_HEAD

Checkout

git fetch origin refs/heads/G3rihw6xuj2lcqvojuxabx73mkjzsgdd5 && git checkout FETCH_HEAD

Cherry Pick

git fetch origin refs/heads/G3rihw6xuj2lcqvojuxabx73mkjzsgdd5 && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD

Pull

git pull origin refs/heads/G3rihw6xuj2lcqvojuxabx73mkjzsgdd5

Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7c9f8e4866

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

"schema_sha256": "58d36e6a54002a29fe7f45c4f65d966a307212e6d082be75d34772fc5b128209",
"schema_version": 1,
"source_score_packet_sha256": "d62b94c908cf13f894b80f4308c7c2b836bd750cb59fd82916880b92ad92aec1",
"target_byte_tree_sha256": "dc91c627439d64fdf16069e999d98b815021cda01721f3fb5dd63fd4ccc33c86"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Commit the adjudication target trees

In a fresh checkout, this digest cannot be verified because the packet's target/ directory was not committed: the repository .gitignore ignores directories named target, and none of the C, K, R, or X adjudication packets contains target files. build_adjudication_packet includes that tree in the preserved packet digest, while verify_adjudication_packet requires it, so every committed adjudication packet differs from its event hash and the evaluation fails integrity verification. Force-add these trees or store them under a nonignored path.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gxgsta5jm3iasu652ow7bfbefe3c2r6nb branch from 7b40a2e to ddbc4df Compare August 29, 2026 10:42
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the G3rihw6xuj2lcqvojuxabx73mkjzsgdd5 branch from 7c9f8e4 to 93fdb47 Compare August 29, 2026 10:42
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.85%. Comparing base (d7d99e5) to head (c10b7d0).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                        Coverage Diff                         @@
##           Gxgsta5jm3iasu652ow7bfbefe3c2r6nb    #3529   +/-   ##
==================================================================
  Coverage                              91.85%   91.85%           
==================================================================
  Files                                     20       20           
  Lines                                   6093     6093           
==================================================================
  Hits                                    5597     5597           
  Misses                                   496      496           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Complete independent blind scoring, adjudication, condition unblinding, and
the preregistered result for all 80 reports. Preserve score packets, ledgers,
adjudications, integrity checks, event history, and the machine-readable result
needed to reproduce the decision.

V3 earns 272 of 300 required atoms, and every atom reaches 5/5 in S, Q, W, M,
R, and K: symbolic release coverage, quantifier-sensitive existential
certificates, whole-execution behavior, positive multi-version proofs,
abstraction-redesign firewalling, and regression breadth. K nevertheless has
one authority-inventory defect, so it does not pass the complete zero-defect
gate. In C, C1 reaches 1/5 and C3 through C5 reach 3/5; in X, X4, X6, and X7
reach 0/5 and X11 reaches 2/5. Two C reports contain hard TCB or authority
defects.

The aggregate identifies a narrower failure class but does not diagnose it:
agents often reach a plausible conclusion without a complete, reversible
derivation of the quantified case set or construction relation. Because the
all-atoms, hard-error, and authority gates fail, V3 is not accepted despite its
high pooled atom count and strong performance in other modes.

gherrit-pr-id: G3rihw6xuj2lcqvojuxabx73mkjzsgdd5
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gxgsta5jm3iasu652ow7bfbefe3c2r6nb branch from ddbc4df to d7d99e5 Compare August 29, 2026 11:11
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the G3rihw6xuj2lcqvojuxabx73mkjzsgdd5 branch from 93fdb47 to c10b7d0 Compare August 29, 2026 11:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants