Split cookbooks page into common patterns and harnesses & models sections

[dprevoznik]

Summary

The cookbooks page rendered every card in one undifferentiated grid. The "common patterns" grouping only existed in the sidebar nav, which on mobile is hidden behind the navbar drawer — so mobile visitors couldn't see it was there without opening the menu.

This splits the grid into two sections, each under its own heading, matching the existing sidebar grouping in docs.json:

• Common patterns — the 4 pattern cookbooks
• Harnesses & models — the remaining 16 integration/model cookbooks

Card content, tags, and links are unchanged; only the grouping and headings are new.

Testing

• mintlify dev and loaded /cookbooks at a 390px mobile viewport and desktop width — both sections render, cards keep their tag/link/image, and the search box still filters across both sections (it walks the DOM globally, not section-scoped).
• One row in the harnesses & models grid ends up as three same-background cards, since only 4 of those 16 cards use the rarer background color — not fully avoidable without reshuffling cards for looks alone, and outside the scope of this page-visibility fix.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

---

Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only layout change on the cookbooks index with no runtime or API impact.

Overview
The cookbooks landing page no longer uses a single card grid. It now has two on-page sections—Common patterns and Harnesses & models—with separate Columns blocks under each heading, mirroring the sidebar grouping in docs.json.

Common patterns holds the four pattern cookbooks (credentials, payments, Playwright fallback, captcha pausing). Harnesses & models holds the integration/model cards, including Jev Browser Use, which previously led the mixed grid. Card copy, tags, images, and links are unchanged; only layout and grouping moved.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit d6e2372. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[mintlify]

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project	Status	Preview	Updated
Kernel	🟢 Ready	View Preview	Sep 25, 2026, 1:49 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Automations to automatically generate PRs for you.

[cursor]

Risk: Very Low. Approved.

This change only rearranges the cookbooks landing page in cookbooks.mdx. It adds Common patterns and Harnesses & models headings and splits the existing card grid into two groups that match those headings. Card titles, copy, tags, images, and links are unchanged.

• Blast radius is the docs page layout only.
• No application logic, API, auth, or infrastructure changes.
• No code owner review is required on main.

Safe to merge as a documentation layout update.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}

[cursor]

Risk: Very Low. Existing approval stands.

Re-checked this pull request after the merge from main. The pull request still changes only cookbooks.mdx: it adds Common patterns and Harnesses & models headings and splits the existing card grid into those two groups. Card titles, copy, tags, images, and links are unchanged.

• Blast radius is the docs page layout only.
• No application logic, API, auth, or infrastructure changes.
• The merge brings in documentation already on main; it does not add new pull-request changes.
• Code owner review is not required (require_code_owner_review is off, and this repo has no CODEOWNERS file).

Risk is unchanged from the earlier Very Low assessment, so the existing approval is left in place.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}

[cursor]

Risk: Very Low. Existing approval stands.

Re-checked this pull request after the latest merge from main (d6e2372). The only file that still differs from main is cookbooks.mdx. The change adds Common patterns and Harnesses & models headings and splits the existing card grid into those two groups. Card titles, copy, tags, images, and links are unchanged.

• Blast radius is the docs page layout only.
• No application logic, API, auth, or infrastructure changes.
• The merge brings in changelog.mdx and .github/workflows/broken-links.yml that are already on main; those files match main and are not part of this pull request's diff.
• Code owner review is not required (require_code_owner_review is off, and this repo has no CODEOWNERS file).

Risk is unchanged from the earlier Very Low assessment, so the existing approval is left in place.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}