Repository navigation
Describe payment and POS rails without partnership language - #1867
Conversation
The commerce PRD, build specification, guides, internal evidence notes, the commerce skill and FINDINGS described a payment provider as a partner, with partner tenants, legal reviews, revenue share and named merchants, and listed a POS product line. They now describe the Plural integration as the first payment adapter, a generic POS bridge and provider-neutral responsibilities. Applied migrations are unchanged; the tests that assert the edited wording follow it.
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.Scanned FilesNone |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 7672f7bc61
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| **Primary positioning:** Trusted agentic commerce infrastructure for merchants | ||
| **Primary users:** Merchants, payment partners, commerce platforms, AI agent platforms, enterprise operations teams | ||
| **Primary partner rail:** Pine Labs / Plural for payments, checkout, affordability, POS, settlement, and merchant reach | ||
| **Primary payment rail:** Plural, through the provider adapter, for payments, checkout, affordability, POS and settlement |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reviewed commit records both its author and committer as Codex <codex@openai.com>. This violates the explicit rule in AGENTS.md prohibiting tool attribution in author and committer fields and requiring the repository owner's configured identity. Correct the commit attribution before merging; provider-neutral document wording does not resolve this separate publication requirement.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L13-L20
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Summary
Describes payment and POS rails in provider-neutral terms. The commerce PRD, the V1 build specification, the commerce guides, the internal evidence notes, the commerce skill and FINDINGS described a payment provider as a partner: partner tenants, partner legal reviews, revenue share, partner analytics, named partner merchants and a co-branding question. They also listed a POS product line by name. These now read as:
Product references to the Plural integration, connector and environment identifiers, provider URLs and the blog about the Plural capability path are unchanged.
Not changed
Checks