Skip to content

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

3,616 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Nexus Agents

OpenSSF Best Practices OpenSSF Scorecard

Autonomic control plane for AI coding agents — one entry point, adversarial review, tamper-evident hash-chained audit, human-gated closed-loop tuning (autonomous demotion, earned promotion)

npm version License: MIT Node.js Version Claims Registry Drift


Why Nexus Agents?

Nexus-agents is an autonomic control plane for your AI coding agents — Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, and OpenCode. The agents are the data plane: they do the engineering. Nexus-agents is the control plane: it admits work through one entry point, reviews it adversarially before it ships, records every action in a tamper-evident event log, and closes the loop by tuning where the next task goes based on what actually worked.

Borrowing the vocabulary of autonomic computing: the system runs a MAPE-K loop — Monitor, Analyze, Plan, Execute over a shared Knowledge base — so that operating your agent fleet is, as much as the evidence allows, self-managing rather than hand-driven.

The control-plane mapping

Each classic control-plane role maps to a shipped nexus-agents component — the metaphor is load-bearing, not decoration:

Control-plane role nexus-agents component What it does
Scheduler run / MetaOrchestrator One entry point picks (and optionally runs) the right strategy for a goal
Admission control gates (pr_review, consensus_vote, run_quality_gate) Adversarial review and quality gates decide what is allowed to ship
Event log AuditTrail hash chain + verify_audit_chain Append-only, tamper-evident record of every decision
Data plane engineering CLIs Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode do the file edits, tests, PRs

The MAPE-K loop

   ┌────────── Monitor ──────────┐        OutcomeStore · AuditTrail · swarm-health
   │                             ▼        adapter circuit-breaker signals
Execute ◀── Plan ◀── Analyze ◀───┘        LinUCB + TOPSIS scoring, consensus
   │         │                            MetaOrchestrator strategy choice
   │         └── route the next task ──────────────────────────────────────┐
   ▼                                                                        │
 run the strategy ── adversarial review ── audit ── feed outcome back ──────┘
                              shared Knowledge: OutcomeStore + memory backends + audit log

Self-* capabilities

Autonomic systems are described by their self-* properties. Each row below maps to a loop that exists in the codebase today — nothing here is aspirational, and the authority each loop carries is bounded by ADR-0017's authority ladder (observe → suggest → advisory → enforce):

Self-* property What it means here Implementing loop (shipped)
Self-configuring Detects environment and wires itself in nexus-agents setup / doctor (cli-commands.ts) — detects CLIs, writes MCP config, reports health
Self-healing Routes around failing dependencies automatically Adapter circuit-breaker + swarm-health demotion (cli-adapters/circuit-breaker.ts); a capped, auto-decaying, demotion-only TuneAdjustmentStore adjustment
Self-optimizing Learns where the next task should go Closed-loop OutcomeStore → LinUCB + TOPSIS scoring in the CompositeRouter
Self-protecting Constrains what untrusted input and tools can do Trust-tiered input handling, ClawGuard access policies (audit/enforce), Docker/policy sandboxing (security/)

Honesty note: these loops sit at different rungs of the authority ladder. The self-tuning demotion is enforce but bounded (capped, auto-decaying, demotion-only); learned selection and other promotions are still earned per-loop against an evidence threshold plus ratification, not flipped on by default. See ADR-0017.

What it gives you:

  • Adversarial PR reviewpr_review runs 5 voter roles (architect, security, devex, catfish, scope_steward) with a 4-point verification gate. On the v5 evaluation set: 100% bug-catch on a focused synthetic dataset (n=10) and a 50% raw false-positive rate; manual triage reclassified one of two inspected FP cases as a real finding the dataset had mislabeled. These are directional small-n figures, not measured rates. Full numbers and guardrails: docs/research/pr-review-experiment-results-v5.md
  • Drift-detected charterCLAUDE.md + governance:check + blocking CI gates fail the build when documented rules drift from registered behavior (model registry, MCP tools, expert types, skills)
  • Tamper-evident audit trail — every tool call, every voter decision, every routing choice flows through AuditTrail with structured logging and hash-chained append-only storage; integrity is verifiable via the verify_audit_chain MCP tool (tamper-evident, not tamper-proof — see the audit hash-chain threat model)
  • Closed-loop routingOutcomeStore feeds production telemetry back into LinUCB + TOPSIS scoring so the system actually learns from what shipped vs what regressed. A second, bounded loop runs by default: a signal.swarm_unhealthy (adapter circuit-breaker / swarm-health) applies a small, capped, auto-decaying routing demotion via TuneAdjustmentStore — demotion-only, never zeroes a CLI, every adjustment audited, opt-out with NEXUS_TUNE_ENFORCE=false
  • Multi-voter consensusconsensus_vote runs a default 7-role panel (architect, security, devex, ai_ml, pm, catfish, scope_steward; --quick uses 3). Six strategy names (five distinct: higher_order is an alias of opinion_wise, #514): simple/super-majority, unanimous, higher-order Bayesian, opinion-wise, proof-of-learning
You:               "Review this PR / orchestrate this task / vote on this proposal"
                    ↓
Control plane:      admit → schedule/route → adversarial review → audit → learn from outcome
                    ↓
Data plane (agents): Claude Code · Codex · Gemini · OpenCode
                    ↓
Code:               actual edits, tests, PRs, issues

What this is NOT:

  • Not another autonomous coding agent. OpenHands, SWE-agent, AutoGen, Devin, Factory — those are the data plane. Nexus-agents is the control plane above them. Use whichever agents fit; we admit, review, audit, and route their work
  • Not a chat framework. Nothing here orchestrates conversations. It orchestrates real CLI tool invocations with real file I/O and outcome tracking
  • Not a model API proxy. The value is the admission gates, the audit, and the closed-loop tuning. Routing is a consequence of the control-plane work, not the product
  • Not fully autonomous. "Autonomic" means self-managing within bounds, not unsupervised. Every loop's authority is capped by the authority ladder (ADR-0017); promotions to higher authority are earned against evidence and human ratification, never flipped on by default

Where nexus-agents sits in your stack

   Human / IDE / CLI
   (Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, terminal)
            │ MCP Protocol
            ▼
  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │  CONTROL PLANE — what nexus-agents provides          │
  │                                                       │
  │   Scheduler: run / MetaOrchestrator                  │
  │   Admission control: PR review · consensus · gates   │
  │   Event log: tamper-evident hash-chained audit       │
  │   Closed-loop self-tuning (MAPE-K)                   │
  │                                                       │
  │   47 MCP tools · multi-stage CompositeRouter         │
  └────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────┘
                           │
                           ▼ delegates execution to
  ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │  DATA PLANE — the agents that do the actual work     │
  │                                                       │
  │   Claude Code · Codex · Gemini · OpenCode            │
  └────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────┘
                           │
                           ▼ produces
                   Code, tests, PRs, issues

The control plane is the layer that catches the mistakes data-plane agents would otherwise make — bad code shipped, rules drifting from intent, audit gaps, telemetry-free routing — and routes the next task based on what actually worked the last time.


Quick Start (2 minutes)

1. Install

npm install -g nexus-agents

Or as a Claude Code plugin (single-command install from the official marketplace):

/plugin install nexus-agents

See docs/getting-started/PLUGIN_INSTALL.md for plugin-specific setup, or llms-install.md for the short install guide an AI agent can follow.

2. Verify

nexus-agents doctor

Prints a health table — Node version, configured CLIs (claude / codex / gemini / opencode), API keys missing vs present. Read-only; safe to run any time.

3. See what success looks like (60-second smoke task — no API keys needed)

nexus-agents vote --quick --proposal "Use SQLite over JSON files for the outcome store"

You should see:

Nexus Agents Consensus Vote
============================

Collecting votes from 3 agents (timeout: 60s each)...

Proposal: Use SQLite over JSON files for the outcome store

Votes

  ✓ Software Architect: APPROVE (86%)
  ✓ Security Engineer:  APPROVE (74%)
  ✓ Scope Steward:      APPROVE (91%)

Summary

  Approve:  3
  Reject:   0
  Abstain:  0
  Approval: 100.0%
  Threshold: simple_majority

Result: APPROVED

Completed in ~30s

Three voter roles deliberate via whichever local CLIs you have (Claude, Codex, Gemini) — no API keys required. Per-voter reasoning is recorded; the terminal prints the verdict. Mixed outcomes (some approve / some reject) and graceful error handling are demonstrated on the project site hero with a real 7-voter run.

4. Wire into your editor

nexus-agents setup   # Auto-configures MCP server in Claude Code, Cursor, etc.

Restart your editor. The 47 MCP tools (orchestrate, consensus_vote, research_synthesize, verify_audit_chain, …) become available to whatever agent you're already using.

What setup configures

By default, setup writes/updates up to seven things in your environment. Each can be skipped with the corresponding --skip-* flag if you don't want it.

Configured Where written Opt-out flag
MCP server registration (Claude) ~/.claude/mcp.json / Claude Desktop config --skip-mcp
Project rules .cursor/rules/ and/or .claude/rules/ --skip-rules
Session hooks ~/.claude/hooks/ (session-start / pre-tool / etc.) --skip-hooks
OpenCode MCP config ~/.config/opencode/opencode.json --skip-opencode
Gemini MCP config ~/.gemini/mcp.json --skip-gemini
Codex MCP config ~/.codex/config.toml --skip-codex
Project config file ./nexus-agents.yaml --skip-config

Run with --interactive (the default) for a per-step confirm flow, or --no-interactive to accept all defaults.

5. Standalone usage (no editor required)

export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=your-key
nexus-agents orchestrate "Explain the architecture of this codebase"

Security: In default MCP mode, the server communicates only via stdio with the parent process (no network exposure). The REST API (opt-in) auto-generates an API key on first start. For network-exposed deployments, set NEXUS_AUTH_ENABLED=true. See SECURITY.md.


Capabilities

Category Details
Adversarial PR Review pr_review MCP tool: 5 voter roles (architect, security, devex, catfish, scope_steward) with 4-point gate. v5 evaluation (focused synthetic dataset, n=10): 100% bug-catch, 50% raw FP rate; manual triage reclassified one of two inspected FP cases as a real finding (directional small-n, not measured rates) (details)
Consensus Voting 6 strategies: simple_majority, supermajority, unanimous, higher_order (Bayesian correlation-aware), opinion_wise, proof_of_learning
Drift-Detected Charter CLAUDE.md + inject-governance.ts check enforces single-source registries (model registry, MCP tools, expert types). Blocking CI gate fails build on drift
Audit Trail Structured logging for every tool call, voter decision, and routing choice. Tamper-evident hash-chained append-only storage (tamper-evident, not tamper-proof — see threat model); integrity verifiable via verify_audit_chain MCP tool
Closed-Loop Telemetry OutcomeStore feeds LinUCB + TOPSIS scoring; a second bounded, audited self-tuning loop demotes unhealthy CLIs (capped, auto-decaying, on by default, opt-out NEXUS_TUNE_ENFORCE=false)
Security Pipeline Sandboxing (Docker/policy), trust-tiered input handling, SARIF parsing, red-team patterns, ClawGuard access policies (audit/enforce)
Multi-Expert Orchestration 12 built-in expert types coordinated by Orchestrator. Roles bind prompt + tools + memory
Development Pipeline Research → Plan → Vote → Decompose → Implement → QA → Security. Three modes: autonomous, harness (caller implements), dry-run
Memory & Learning 5 user-facing backends (session, belief, agentic, adaptive, typed). Cross-session persistence feeds routing decisions
Research System 9 discovery sources (arXiv, GitHub, Semantic Scholar, etc). Auto-catalog, quality scoring, synthesis into topic clusters
Graph Workflows DAG-based workflow execution with checkpoint/resume, state reduction, and event hooks
47 MCP Tools Agent management, workflow execution, research, memory, codebase intelligence, repo analysis, consensus, operations

Available Experts

Expert Specialization
Code Implementation, debugging, optimization
Architecture System design, patterns, scalability
Security Vulnerability analysis, secure coding
Testing Test strategies, coverage, test generation
QA Acceptance criteria, regression checks
Documentation Technical writing, API docs
DevOps CI/CD, deployment, infrastructure
Research Literature review, state-of-the-art analysis
PM Product management, requirements, priorities
UX User experience, usability, accessibility
Infrastructure Server management, bare metal, networking
Data Viz Charts, dashboards, visual data presentation

Supported CLIs & Providers

Nexus-agents routes tasks through 5 CLI adapters, each connecting to major AI providers:

CLI Provider Best For
claude Anthropic (Claude) Complex reasoning, analysis
gemini Google (Gemini) Long context, multimodal
codex OpenAI (Codex CLI) Code generation, reasoning
codex-mcp OpenAI (Codex MCP) MCP-native Codex integration
opencode Custom OpenAI-compat Custom endpoints, local models

CLI Commands

nexus-agents                    # Start MCP server (default)
nexus-agents doctor             # Check installation health
nexus-agents setup              # Configure Claude CLI integration
nexus-agents orchestrate "..."  # Run task with experts
nexus-agents vote "proposal"    # Multi-agent consensus voting
nexus-agents review <pr-url>    # Review a GitHub PR
nexus-agents expert list        # List available experts
nexus-agents workflow list      # List workflow templates
nexus-agents config init        # Generate config file
nexus-agents init --portable    # Create workspace-local .nexus-agents/ for sandboxes
nexus-agents init --portable --mcp-config  # Also emit .mcp.json wiring Claude Code to it
nexus-agents init --portable --install --mcp-config  # …and install the binary into the workspace
nexus-agents fitness-audit      # Run fitness score audit
nexus-agents research query     # Query research registry
nexus-agents --help             # Full command list

See docs/ENTRYPOINTS.md for the complete CLI reference (28+ commands).


MCP Tools

When running as an MCP server, the following tools are available. Start with run — the default entry point: give it a goal and the MetaOrchestrator picks (and, with execute: true, runs) the right strategy. The other pipeline tools are advanced force-strategy paths for pinning a specific one.

Tool Description
orchestrate Task orchestration with Orchestrator coordination
create_expert Create a specialized expert agent
execute_expert Run a task through a previously-created expert (by expertId)
run_workflow Run a linear workflow template (use run_graph_workflow for DAGs)
delegate_to_model Pick the best-fit existing model for a task (no registry change)
list_experts Inventory of expert ROLES for create_expert
list_workflows Inventory of multi-step TEMPLATES for run_workflow
consensus_vote Multi-model consensus voting on proposals
research_query Query research registry (status, overlap, stats, search)
research_add Add an arXiv PAPER to the registry (for non-paper sources use research_add_source)
research_add_source Add a NON-PAPER source (repo/tool/blog) — for arXiv papers use research_add
research_discover Discover papers/repos from external sources
research_analyze Analyze registry for gaps, trends, coverage
research_catalog_review Review auto-cataloged research references
research_synthesize Synthesize registry into topic clusters with themes
survey_oss_landscape Transient OSS project search (license, stars, last-commit) via GitHub
vendor_publishing_audit Look up a vendor's signing infrastructure (GPG keys, URL patterns, signature shape)
compare_data_feeds Diff two YAML/JSON feeds: coverage + per-field axes
memory_query Query across all memory backends
memory_stats Memory system statistics dashboard
memory_write Write to typed memory backends
weather_report Multi-CLI performance weather report
issue_triage Triage GitHub issues with trust classification
run_graph_workflow Run a DAG workflow with per-node checkpoints + audit trail (linear → run_workflow)
execute_spec Execute AI software factory spec pipeline
registry_import Draft YAML for a NEW model entry (for picking existing models use delegate_to_model)
query_trace Query execution traces for observability
query_task_state Query the structured task-state log for a task ID
get_job_result Read result of an async-mode dispatch by jobId (#3042 / #2631)
list_jobs List async-mode jobs across all tools — cross-session discovery (#3046 / #2631)
cancel_job Mark an async-mode job as cancelled — idempotent (#3042 Stage 1b)
ci_health_check CI infrastructure health — composes GitHub status + recent-runs activity (#3076)
verify_audit_chain Verify hash chain of a FileAuditStorage audit log directory
repo_analyze Analyze GitHub repository structure
repo_security_plan Generate security scanning pipeline for a repo
extract_symbols TypeScript-compiler-API AST symbols from a SINGLE file (functions/classes/types)
search_codebase Cross-file search over declared symbol NAMES (declarations only, not usages)
search_usages Structural usage/call-site search for a symbol via ast-grep (calls, member calls, new, imports, references) — the "where is X used" gap search_codebase cannot fill
run_dev_pipeline Full dev pipeline: research, plan, vote, implement, QA
run_pipeline Execute a pipeline plugin by name with typed input
pr_review Multi-voter PR review with verification gate (experimental)
supply_chain_tradeoff_panel Per-axis tradeoff vote for build-vs-buy / supply-chain decisions
improvement_review Threshold-gated observability loop — surfaces routing/tech-debt/bug/security signals from outcome+fitness data; files candidate issues
run_quality_gate Run the QA quality gate (typecheck/lint/tests/build/security) over a project dir; returns structured pass/fail verdict + feedback
suggest_research_tasks SUGGEST-ONLY: candidate pipeline tasks from research_discover findings for review — files/executes nothing (#1715)
list_available_models Probe all model-discovery transports (OpenRouter API + opencode/claude/codex/gemini CLIs) and report per-transport health — validates the CLIs/APIs are reachable (#3406)
run Default entry point — give a goal, MetaOrchestrator picks the strategy; returns the routing decision (execute:false, read-only) or runs it inline (execute:true; dev-pipeline+pipeline+research+consensus wired) (#3548)

Configuration

Environment Variables:

Variable Description
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY Claude API key
OPENAI_API_KEY OpenAI API key
GOOGLE_AI_API_KEY Gemini API key
NEXUS_LOG_LEVEL Log level (debug/info/warn/error)

Generate config file:

nexus-agents config init   # Creates nexus-agents.yaml

Documentation

Topic Link
Full CLI Reference docs/ENTRYPOINTS.md
Architecture docs/architecture/README.md
Contributing CONTRIBUTING.md
Coding Standards CODING_STANDARDS.md
Quick Start Guide QUICK_START.md

Development

git clone https://github.com/nexus-substrate/nexus-agents.git
cd nexus-agents
pnpm install
pnpm build
pnpm test

Requirements: Node.js 22.x LTS, pnpm 9.x


Contributing

  1. Fork the repository
  2. Create a feature branch (git checkout -b feat/amazing-feature)
  3. Commit with conventional commits (feat(scope): add feature)
  4. Open a Pull Request

See CONTRIBUTING.md for details.


License

MIT - See LICENSE


Built with Claude Code

About

Governance substrate for your AI coding agents — adversarial review, drift-detected rules, immutable audit, closed-loop telemetry

Resources

Code of conduct

Contributing

Security policy

Stars

18 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Used by

Contributors

Languages