RFC-10: propose NGFF editorial board

[joshmoore]

As agreed during the OME2026 community meeting. For review by the OME Management Group.

see: https://bit.ly/ome2026-gov-proposal

cc: @vuhlmann

[github-actions]

Automated Review URLs

• Readthedocs

[normanrz]

Not sure where you wanted to specify this, but I still think the formal acts of the OMG should be a default-accept of recommendation of the EB within a specified time frame. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1picvG4yq0K_gIiF83C5rAy3AguqJeWkdAxL-vds5BgI/edit?disco=AAAB3IaXQ3Q

[joshmoore]

Ah, thank you. I see what happened. A copy (fork 🙈) went live for the OME2026 meeting and the two drifted. I'll re-sync post vacation.

[joshmoore]

I think the main two missing sections were:

• ZSC: re-added
• OMG relationship: rewritten

Let me know what you think.

[lubianat]

also for after 🌴 ordering is alphabetical, probably not what we want:

related:

• Sort RFCs from highest number to lowest on website #426

[imagesc-bot]

This pull request has been mentioned on Image.sc Forum. There might be relevant details there:

https://forum.image.sc/t/our-proposed-roadmap-to-ome-zarr-1-0/121995/10

[normanrz]

Thanks for the edits!
I think a few failure modes need more thoughts:

• If EB members fail on their duties (e.g. prolonged inactivity), how can they be involuntarily removed? Is that a responsibility of the OMG?
• What options does the EB have in case of failure of the OMG to fulfill their duties (e.g. approvals, appointments)?

[lubianat]

the rfc/index.md file has not been changed, so I cannot make an inline suggestion.

changing the toctree content in rfc/index.md to

:maxdepth: 1
:hidden:
0/index
1/index
2/index
3/index
4/index
5/index
6/index
7/index
8/index
9/index
10/index

Fixes the sidebar issue

[joshmoore]

Pushed, @lubianat. Anything else?

[lubianat]

not on my end, LGTM