NO-ISSUE: Fix issue lookup author for rebase target branch - #7240
NO-ISSUE: Fix issue lookup author for rebase target branch#7240pacevedom wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
@pacevedom: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review. WalkthroughThe freeze issue author identifier changes from ChangesFreeze issue author matching
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This is a localized issue-lookup behavior fix with no actionable merge-blocking risk remaining; it is merge-ready after normal checks and review. Suggested labels: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15✅ Passed checks (15 passed)
Full details: Stable And Deterministic Test NamesExplanation PASS: The PR changes only Full details: Test Structure And QualityExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only Full details: Microshift Test CompatibilityExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only the Python constant Full details: Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test CompatibilityExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only one line in Full details: Topology-Aware Scheduling CompatibilityExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only Full details: Ote Binary Stdout ContractExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only the Python constant Full details: Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test CompatibilityExplanation PASS. The pull request changes only the Python constant Full details: No-Weak-CryptoExplanation PASS. The pull request changes only Full details: Container-PrivilegesExplanation PASS. The pull request changes one Python constant in Full details: No-Sensitive-Data-In-LogsExplanation PASS: The pull request changes only ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: pacevedom The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest |
|
@pacevedom: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/retest |
Summary by CodeRabbit