Repository navigation
2026.10.13 - DCP Architecture Deepening Planning - #86
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…d execution module for DCP compression
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Documentation gate for the 2026-10-13 architecture deepening proposal. Planning commits
06a7c29(design + phase 1–3 extraction + execution module scaffolds) and2a7fa53(per-phase implementation plans with checkbox status); rangemaster..HEADis+636over four new files underdocs/superpowers/{specs,plans}/.Each phase plan in
docs/superpowers/plans/2026-10-13-dcp-depth-phase-0[1-3]-*.mdpins module paths, public operation names, integration points, and behavioral assertions for one atomic step, sharing the same global-constraints block carried from the 2026-10-12 architecture design:The deepening revisits two earlier placements from the 2026-10-12 architecture design on purpose: the prior review kept approval/checkpoint orchestration and runtime timing in their current owners; this proposal concentrates them now that those owners have shipped and remaining caller-managed ordering is the bottleneck. Earlier codec, block-lifecycle, tool-selection, and guarded-action responsibilities are preserved untouched in every phase.
tests/change set is zero for this branch; the planning rule from prior phase plans holds: implementation checkboxes are intentionally unchecked at plan-writing time, follow-up phase PRs ship the test changes with their source.Evidence
This branch ships the planning artifacts only; no
src/,tests/,docs/agents/,dcp.schema.json,package.json,CHANGELOG.md,README.md, orGLOSSARY.mdwas touched.Implementation is gated on each follow-up phase PR; the documented planning baseline is
41da383(master HEAD) with a freshpnpm checkrecorded in the spec: formatting, lint, type checking, and 66 test files / 1,153 tests. A working-tree test run is not applicable to a docs-only change.Each phase plan is independently shippable against its own scoped test files:
The review-focus tables in each plan carry the verification input/condition matrix that the implementation must satisfy — separation of text vs. dashboard percentage precision, zero counters vs. unavailable totals, fresh nested state on every read, append-failure retry + fingerprint retention, equal-fingerprint force-decision consumption, untimed-compression shutdown persistence, allow vs. ask abort semantics, and timing-zero + multi-block completion.
Merge Danger
Door: two-way
The change is documentation only and reverts cleanly: deleting the four new files in
docs/superpowers/{specs,plans}/returns the repository to its prior state with zero impact onsrc/,tests/,package.json, the snapshot codec, persistence ordering, model-visible compression text, pruning/compression algorithms, policy, tool selection, statistics calculations, the guardedexecuteDcpActioncontract, nativeui.confirmapproval, the publicExtensionAPIsurface, README, CHANGELOG, or any GitHub workflow. No snapshot version, durable field, schema, dependency, configuration option, release, or glossary term ships in this PR. Each follow-up phase PR is revertible on its own, and the design also states that revert ordering for the executable phases is "revert later dependent phases first."Blast Radius: planning documentation
Touches only
docs/superpowers/specs/(one new deepening design) anddocs/superpowers/plans/(three new phase-1–3 plans),+636lines. No production source, test, snapshot, schema, configuration, dependency, README, CHANGELOG, agent docs,GLOSSARY.md, or release workflow is modified, so no consumer of the published extension observes any behavior change. The only observable change is that a reviewer now has a four-document approved design that sequences future architecture deepening into three independently shippable phases with per-phase review/test focus, rollback notes, and an explicit revisit of the 12 October checkpoint-placement decision with its rationale.