Skip to content

Update for better routing between stripe directory and stripe projects - #504

Open
tgalaxystripe wants to merge 1 commit into
stripe:mainfrom
tgalaxystripe:patch-2
Open

Update for better routing between stripe directory and stripe projects#504
tgalaxystripe wants to merge 1 commit into
stripe:mainfrom
tgalaxystripe:patch-2

Conversation

@tgalaxystripe

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The current stripe-projects description has three problems:

It competes with Directory by claiming vague task and component requests such as “I need a database” and “I need hosting.”

It conflates exploration, vendor selection, provisioning, and ongoing project management.

Its long trigger list obscures the most important distinction: explicit execution or existing-project intent.

This conflicts with the stripe-directory skill, which owns external-service discovery and explicitly prohibits provisioning without a user request. Since agents scan the description to select a skill, the discriminating routing rule should come first, as recommended by the skill-authoring guidance.

(Written with Orbit)

The current stripe-projects description has three problems:

It competes with Directory by claiming vague task and component requests such as “I need a database” and “I need hosting.”
It conflates exploration, vendor selection, provisioning, and ongoing project management.
Its long trigger list obscures the most important distinction: explicit execution or existing-project intent.

This conflicts with the stripe-directory skill, which owns external-service discovery and explicitly prohibits provisioning without a user request. Since agents scan the description to select a skill, the discriminating routing rule should come first, as recommended by the skill-authoring guidance.
@cla-assistant

cla-assistant Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

1 similar comment
@cla-assistant

cla-assistant Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant