refactor: centralize record status copy - #97
Conversation
|
Thank you — the mechanical work here is clean. I verified it against
Could you split this into two PRs? The two halves of #48 have different risk profiles. Delete Hold the copy extraction behind #99. The purpose of That is a scoping problem on our side, not a defect in your patch. Sorry for the extra round-trip. One design note for when the extraction does land: Splitting the sentence into Two smaller ones:
|
|
Follow-up: I split #48, so the two halves now have their own trackers.
If you would rather not carry this further, that is completely fine — say so and we will take it from here. Your branch is retained either way, and both issues point at it. |
|
Thank you for this — the shape is right, and it is what #100 asks for. Two things have moved underneath it since you opened it, and both change what should be in this PR. 1. The
|
Summary
Validation
Closes #48