Skip to content

docs: describe the action's objective output as the simplified score - #88

Merged
2 commits merged into
mainfrom
docs/action-objective-output
Sep 27, 2026
Merged

2 commits merged into
mainfrom
docs/action-objective-output

Conversation

@vitali87

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Problem

README's action-output table and action.yml called objective the "Plan objective score (lower is better)", implying the score_plan objective from METHODOLOGY.md. scripts/score_pr.py actually computes overflow × 1000 + file_scatter × 50 + groups — no underflow, undersized/tiny-group, dependency-edge, or depth/width terms. Same 2-group plan: action 100052, score_plan 100090.

Change

Docs only: both descriptions now state the simplified formula and that it is not the full score_plan objective. (Importing score_plan from the script would require the package in the action's Python; a separate change if wanted.)

Local review: 5/5.

scripts/score_pr.py computes overflow*1000 + file_scatter*50 + groups,
not the full score_plan objective (underflow, edges, tiny groups,
depth/width) that README and METHODOLOGY describe; say so.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

Next included review available in 43 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: a9debd86-ca56-4621-bc10-e27dfcb70df0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 671a081 and a269965.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md
  • action.yml

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Also note that the objective output is 0 when no split plan was scored
(under the limit, or an oversized PR the planner could not split), which
main's score_pr.py now emits.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015rnEEjXWDBdePRhKMmZr1w
@vitali87 vitali87 closed this pull request by merging all changes into main in 8ca9e3b Sep 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants