Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b4f5355ea7
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| Server Side Public License | ||
| VERSION 1, OCTOBER 16, 2018 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Align license declarations across repository metadata
Changing LICENSE to SSPL introduces conflicting licensing signals because README.md/Federation/README.md still state Apache-2.0 and Directory.Build.props still sets PackageLicenseExpression to Apache-2.0; package consumers and compliance tooling can therefore receive contradictory obligations depending on which source they read. Update the ancillary metadata in the same change so distribution artifacts and docs do not continue advertising Apache after the license switch.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
No description provided.