Repository navigation
docs(f016a): close F016a and advance BACKLOG to F016b - #83
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Why: PR #81 merged F016a S1-S3; the plan still said in_progress and BACKLOG still said merge pending. Record the close, reviewed/rebase heads, CI evidence, and the F016b next slice so the truth sources match the merged work.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Docs-only bookkeeping after PR #81 merged.
in_progress->closed; adds Close record with PR feat(f016a): A2A ingress and custody E2E (S1-S3) #81 mergebc778185e, reviewed head6f82d5e8, rebase head6cbf02b1a, post-merge CI41179351875green, and residual F016b/F016c.F016a done; F016b next.Verification:
node scripts/check-doc-index.mjspasses (26 feature docs / 16 BACKLOG rows);git diff --checkclean. No code or scope changes.