Skip to content

Consistency05 false report for lame delegation #1522

Closed

Description

@pawal

I received this bug report in Gonemaster:
https://codeberg.org/pawal/gonemaster/issues/72

CONSISTENCY05 should clarify that CHILD_ZONE_LAME is only appropriate when no usable child-side address lookup path exists at all. A disjoint parent/child NS set where parent-listed and child-listed servers both answer authoritatively should be classified as glue/authoritative address mismatch, not lameness.

The tested domain name is disjoint.superdns.nl

Activity

  1. added
    T-BugType: Bug in software or error in test case description
    A-TestCaseArea: Test case specification or implementation of test case
    on Apr 29, 2026
  2. matsduf commented on Apr 29, 2026

    @matsduf
    Contributor

    The specification seems to be right. We will investigate.

  3. pawal commented on Oct 3, 2026

    @pawal
    Author

    Seems to be resolved with the latest release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    A-TestCaseArea: Test case specification or implementation of test caseT-BugType: Bug in software or error in test case description

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions