Repository navigation
docs: point the CF-7 review kit at its restored location (#280) - #473
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The cf7-closeout worktree was pruned after #443 merged, so the receipt's launch commands pointed at nothing. The saved homes are restored into the cf7-review-kit worktree from the task-evidence copy, and both saved Task Notes reopen read-only on a build of 0a8c513. Records the two things a reviewer will see: the notes predate #450, and the homes name the old repository path. No human row changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
BunsDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2026
* Correct merged PR dates to October 31 UTC (#470) * docs: point the CF-7 review kit at its restored location (#280) (#473) The cf7-closeout worktree was pruned after #443 merged, so the receipt's launch commands pointed at nothing. The saved homes are restored into the cf7-review-kit worktree from the task-evidence copy, and both saved Task Notes reopen read-only on a build of 0a8c513. Records the two things a reviewer will see: the notes predate #450, and the homes name the old repository path. No human row changes. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
BunsDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2026
* Correct merged PR dates to October 31 UTC (#470) * docs: point the CF-7 review kit at its restored location (#280) (#473) The cf7-closeout worktree was pruned after #443 merged, so the receipt's launch commands pointed at nothing. The saved homes are restored into the cf7-review-kit worktree from the task-evidence copy, and both saved Task Notes reopen read-only on a build of 0a8c513. Records the two things a reviewer will see: the notes predate #450, and the homes name the old repository path. No human row changes. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Docs only, for #280. The CF-7 close-out receipt told Val to launch the review homes from
.worktrees/cf7-closeout, butscripts/worktree.sh pruneremoved that worktree on 2026-10-31, after #443 merged. This PR points the receipt anddocs/status.mdat the restored kit.What changed
cf7-review-kitworktree from~/.claude/task-evidence/worktree-prune-2026-10-29/cf7-closeout/apps/desktop/.probes/. That source copy is untouched..worktrees/cf7-review-kit/apps/desktop.cf7-closeoutpath, so the Review tab reads "Not a git repository". The Note and Task view are unaffected.docs/status.md: the CF-7 follow-up entry says where the kit now lives.Checked on a build of
0a8c513No human row changes. The four review rows stay
openfor Val.Tests,
pnpm build && pnpm test. Other sessions kept the machine at load average 45–70, and timing tests failed under that load:claude-lifecyclerunner stop,demoslow turn, and twopluginsnative-timeout cases. All four files passed when re-run in isolation (53/53).claude-lifecyclecase hit its 6 s timeout. On its own, with the native suite, it passed (46 passed, 6 skipped).This PR changes only Markdown.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code